Government shouldn't pass laws about sexual orientation
The government doesn't have any business passing laws deciding if people should or shouldn't be gay.
Source
Court blocks California law banning gay therapy
Associated Press Fri Dec 21, 2012 6:29 PM
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court has put the brakes on a first-of-its-kind California law that bans therapy that aims to turn gay minors straight.
A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an emergency order Friday putting the law on hold until it can hear full arguments on the issue. The law was set to take effect Jan. 1.
Licensed counselors who practice so-called “reparative therapy” and two families who say their teenage sons have benefited from it sought the injunction after a lower court judge refused the request.
The California Legislature passed the law and Gov. Jerry Brown signed it in September. It would make mental health professionals who engage in efforts to change their clients’ sexual orientations subject to discipline by state licensing boards.
Lobby group takes on Christian-based center
Source
Lobby group takes on Christian-based center
By Mary K. Reinhart The Republic | azcentral.com Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:43 PM
In recent years, the conservative Center for Arizona Policy has been one of the most successful lobbying organizations in state politics, winning passage of far-reaching abortion restrictions and religion-focused bills.
But a growing atheist lobbying group is taking on the Christian-based center and its well-connected president, Cathi Herrod, and aims to create a higher profile at the Legislature next session.
Serah Blain, executive director of the Secular Coalition of Arizona, said the state is the first in the nation to have a full-time legislative lobbyist representing a “non-theistic” organization.
The lobbying group now represents 17 secular organizations, many of whom Blain said were motivated by their anger over recent legislation, including new laws limiting abortion and contraception coverage.
“They just really took things too far,” Blain said of Herrod and lawmakers. “A lot of people who under normal circumstances would not be working together have become interested in coalition work to stop their reign of terror.”
In addition to pushing back against Center for Arizona Policy bills, Blain hopes to promote two measures at the Legislature next session: an Oregon-style death-with-dignity bill and a proposal to teach science-based sex education in public schools. Both bills have been introduced over the years but rarely have received hearings.
And she is working to organize non-religious people in communities around the state who may be unaware just how many of them are out there. During the fall, Blain held a series of “secular values” town halls to draw people into the coalition, whose members include local chapters of the Humanist Society, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, and the Secular Student Alliance.
“In order to have any efficacy in politics, we’re going to have to form some groups and start building communities,” she said.
A study released Tuesday by the Pew Research Center found that people with no religious affiliation make up the third-largest group worldwide, after Christians and Muslims. About 16 percent of people in the U.S. say they are religiously unaffiliated.
Herrod did not return calls seeking comment. The Center for Arizona Policy’s website says the Legislature has passed 114 bills supported by the center since 1995.
Rep. Debbie Lesko, R-Glendale, said the Republican-controlled Legislature is a socially and fiscally conservative body and that has aligned with the Center for Arizona Policy’s objectives. But the bills backed by the center aren’t injecting religion into politics, she said.
Lesko said her objective was to get government out of religion when she sponsored legislation that allowed religious-affiliated companies to eliminate contraception coverage for their employees.
“The government was imposing a mandate and I allowed some organizations to opt out of that mandate,” she said. “There was some kind of thought that we were intruding on people’s lives. In my legislation, I wanted to do the opposite.”
Blain said the center’s lobbying activities could run afoul of its tax-exempt status. The coalition and other groups this year filed a formal complaint with the IRS.
The secular coalition is registered as 501(c)4 political advocacy organization, which means their donations are taxed. The Center for Arizona Policy is a 501(c)3, so donations are tax-deductible, but the center is prohibited from supporting political candidates and is subject to limits on lobbying.
-----------
For more information about the Secular Coalition for Arizona, call 602-363-8018 or go to
www.secularaz.org.
Federal appeals court rules against Hobby Lobby on contraception
I guess the First Amendment is NULL and VOID and the government can force you to do things which are against your religious beliefs.
I think it should be a woman's decision to decide if she wants an abortion, not some government nannies!
I think it should be a business's decision to decide if they want to give their employees free emergency contraceptives, not some government nannies!
Source
Federal appeals court rules against Hobby Lobby on contraception
Steve Olafson Reuters
8:51 p.m. CST, December 20, 2012
OKLAHOMA CITY (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Thursday rejected a claim by an arts and crafts chain that wants to be exempted from a requirement to provide emergency contraceptives to employees because it violates the religious principles of its owners.
The Court of Appeals in Denver ruled against family-owned Hobby Lobby's assertion that the religious beliefs of its owners should relieve them from providing the "morning after" and "week after" pills to their employees, as required under President Barack Obama's signature health care reforms.
"The Green family is disappointed with this ruling," said Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, which is assisting Hobby Lobby in the legal case. "The Greens will continue to make their case on appeal that this unconstitutional mandate infringes their right to earn a living while remaining true to their faith."
The medications at issue are classified as emergency contraceptives by the Food and Drug Administration, but the owners of Hobby Lobby call them "abortion-inducing drugs" because they are often taken after conception.
The lawsuit is among 42 legal actions that have been filed over the issue, according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a non-profit law firm in Washington, D.C.
The company faces fines of up to $1.3 million daily if it disobeys the mandate, which takes effect on January 1 for Hobby Lobby, a $3 billion chain, and its smaller sister operation, Mardel, a Christian-oriented bookstore and educational supply company.
Both companies are owned by the Green family of Oklahoma City, whose patriarch, David Green, is ranked 79th on Forbes Magazine's list of the 400 richest Americans, with a net worth of $4.5 billion.
The family operates 514 Hobby Lobby stores in 41 states and employ 13,240 people. Inspirational Christian music is played in the stores, which are closed on Sundays.
U.S. District Judge Joe Heaton of the Western District of Oklahoma ruled on November 19 that the privately-owned companies are secular, for-profit enterprises that do not possess the same religious rights as the individual members of the family.
(Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Lisa Shumaker)
Other articles on mixing religion and government
Previous
article
on mixing religion and government.
More
artilces
on mixing religion and govenrment.